Silent House

Silent House (2011)

Silent House (2011)

The premise is simple enough: a young girl is helping her father and uncle clear out the old family house and fix it up so they can put it on the market when a mysterious noise alerts her to danger.  The rest of the film is a harrowing descent into terror.

Another Americanization of a scary foreign film (the Uruguayan film, “La Casa Muda”), this film got a lot of attention for billing itself as one long, continuous shot.  It’s not, but the fact that the film makers are able to make it appear so convincingly is a thing to behold if you’re fan of the actual art of film making.

Though not shot as POV, the fact that it is shot as one continuous take focused on Sarah (Elizabeth Olsen) gives it that feel and it works really well, for the most part.  There are some moments that are hard to see because of the lighting and filming approach, but in short order you’re drawn in with her and really feel like a part of the film as it unfolds more or less in real time.  The suspense becomes palpable and by focusing solely on her and her reactions, you’re forced to try to understand what’s going on the same way she is.  You’re just as in the dark, both literally and figuratively, until the conclusion.  Olsen’s performance is nothing short of masterful.

The conclusion is the one issue I had with the film.  You’re given the clues to basically figure out what is going on, but the clues themselves don’t make much sense.  Without giving anything away, why would they be there and why wouldn’t they freak her dad and her uncle out?  Her mysterious friend is also handled somewhat clumsily, but not enough to detract much from the rest of the film.

 

Stars: 4/5

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Silent House

  1. Larry I have to completely disagree with you. I know the original was considered a cool Indy film due to the continuous shot, but it didn’t add anything here other than cheapen the over all quality of the movie. The friend in the beginning was the worst use of a red herring ever. The movie had me until about the car part. It just got stupid, why would they go back… Once you realize it’s her going nuts and not a ghost, it just seems stupid to me. Last house on the left remake was far superior. I agree Olsen did an outstanding acting job, and I hope we see more of her soon. I think this movie did get a liitle over hype from this kinda being her breakout movie.

  2. The friend was poorly executed and I thought the exact same thing when they returned.

    I plan to see the original as well, to compare, but while the shooting style did leave some technical aspects to be desired, I thought the fact that they were able to make it look like a single shot was awesome. Greatest editing I’ve ever seen.

    As for remakes, “Last House on the Left” is one of the better ones that I’ve seen lately. I was surprised at how much of the original film’s raw brutality they left in it – I fully expected it to be watered down a lot more.

  3. My biggest problem with it (SPOILER) was the photos. Knowing what they were, I don’t get why her dad and uncle were so unimpressed at finding them just just lying around the place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s